How I Evaluate Fiction Submissions
by
James R. Cypher, The Cypher Agency
Today, because of widespread corporate
downsizing within the publishing business, literary agents become
"first readers" by default. Accordingly, they make an initial, often
hurried, judgment about whether they conceivably could find a nice,
warm home for a writer's novel.
Admittedly, judging fiction is a highly
subjective undertaking, but here are a few criteria(*) I used when I
decided whether to accept or reject a writer's work:
(1) Overall. I'm most impressed
by something I haven't seen before: a new idea, a new voice, the
electricity one feels at encountering something unique, the totally
unexpected. But, alas, I rarely encounter a manuscript that overwhelms
me with paroxysms of joyous discovery.
(2) Voice. I ask several
questions as I try to put myself in the position of a prospective
reader. Do I want to spend several hours with this writer? Do I trust
him or her? Does the writer render familiar scenes in ways that are
new, or unfamiliar ones in ways that make me see them clearly? Does the
writer reveal enough of himself through his characters to make me enjoy
his company?
(3) Pace. After I read one
page, do I want to read the next? If the writer has written crime
fiction, a thriller or a horror or suspense novel, is it a genuine
"page turner"? If not, the novel is not going to compete well against
the thousands of other submissions acquisitions editors receive each
year.
(4) Characterization. Do I like
the characters? Are they three-dimensional, or are they mere cardboard
cutouts? Do I care about their fates? If characters come alive, what
they do becomes the story.
(5) Plot. Plot evolves from
characters in conflict. The most interesting stories involve characters
who want something badly. The more urgent their need, the greater the
reader's interest.
(6) Style. No two writers are
likely to write the same scene in exactly the same way. But I'm most
impressed when I feel a writer has succeeded in creating the right
word, the right phrase, the right sentence, the right paragraph, the
right scene, the right chapter and the right story (whatever "right"
is).
(7) Particularity and verisimilitude.
If the writer gets his details right, accuracy pales before invention
if the invention is convincing. If the writer convinces me something is
true, I don't really care if it's actually true. Detail is the
lifeblood of fiction -- the detail that differentiates one character
from another, one act from another, one place from others like it. One
of the most important aspects of successful creative writing is to
examine each word for its precise meaning and the likely effect of
every group of words on the emotions of the reader.
(8) Dialogue. Poorly written
dialogue is among the chief reasons agents and editors reject
manuscripts. If the dialogue doesn't work, the manuscript gets bounced.
Contrary to popular view, dialogue is not a recording of actual speech;
rather, it is a semblance of speech, an invented language of exchanges
between characters that build in tempo or content toward climaxes.
(9) Showing versus telling.
Another reason agents and editors are quick to reject submissions is
that the writer, consciously or not, has reported a story rather than
showing it. Showing means having characters do things that excite
readers' interest, making those scenes visual, letting readers
experience what happens firsthand.
(10) Mastery of English grammar, usage and punctuation.
In the "good old days," publishers invested lots of money in line
editing to improve the quality of a writer's work. Today, a manuscript
has to be nearly perfect at the time of its submission to pass muster
with acquisitions editors. If a manuscript contains many "cosmetic
flaws," the editor will reject it out of hand. Therefore, it is
incumbent upon the writer to ensure that his submission does not
contain spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors, poorly chosen
words, an abundance of adjectives and adverbs, overuse of passive voice
constructions, etc.
(11) Marketplace requirements.
The first consideration that goes into an editorial decision about
whether to acquire a writer's work is a marketing one: whether the
novel will sell a sufficient number of copies to make back its costs,
including the advance to the writer, and turn a profit.
(12) Length. Unless a writer is
of the stature of a James Michener, a Stephen King or a Norman Mailer,
a 150,000- or 200,000-word manuscript is not going to pass muster in
this era of ever-increasing paper costs. Fiction editors now prefer
novels in the range of 70,000 to 80,000 words, but, with rare
exceptions, not exceeding 100,000 words.
__________